You are using an unsupported browser. Please update your browser to the latest version on or before July 31, 2020.
close
You are viewing the article in preview mode. It is not live at the moment.
Home > Sighthound ALPR > ALPR - Product Overview > Vehicle Recognition Benchmarks
Vehicle Recognition Benchmarks
print icon

Vehicle Recognition Benchmarks

 

Top-1 car classification accuracy on Stanford car dataset

 

Methods Accuracy (top-1)
Sighthound 93.6%
Krause et al. [1] 92.8%
Lin et al. [2] 91.3%
Zhang et al. [3] 88.4%
Xie et al. [4] 86.3%
Gosselin et al. [5] 82.7%

 

 

 

Top-1 & top-5 car classification accuracy of compCar dataset

 

We compared our results with popular deep networks of GoogLeNet, Overfeat and AlexNet reported in [6].

 

 

Methods Accuracy (top1) Accuracy (top5)
Sighthound Cloud 95.88% 99.53%
GoogLeNet [6] 91.2% 98.1%
Overfeat [6] 87.9% 96.9%
AlexNet [6] 81.9% 94.0%

 

 

 

References


1. Krause, Jonathan, e.a.: Fine-grained recognition without part annotations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2015)
2. Lin, T.Y., RoyChowdhury, A., Maji., S.: Bilinear cnn models for fine-grained visual recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. (2015)
3. et al., X.Z.: Embedding label structures for fine-grained feature representation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2016)
4. Xie, Saining, e.a.: Hyper-class augmented and regularized deep learning for finegrained image classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2015)
5. Gosselin, P.H., Murray, N., Jegou, H., Perronnin., F.: Re-visiting the fisher vector for fine-grained classification. In: Pattern Recognition Letters. (2014)
6. Yang, Linjie, e.a.: A large-scale car dataset for fine-grained categorization and verification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2015)

scroll to top icon